Re: are CFs consistent after a repair

2013-02-08 Thread Brian Jeltema
I'm afraid I can't investigate further; enough time has elapsed that it appears the inconsistencies have worked their way out of the cluster. On Feb 7, 2013, at 9:25 PM, aaron morton wrote: >> 'nodetool -pr repair' > Assuming nodetool repair -pr > > If there is no write activity all reads (a

Re: are CFs consistent after a repair

2013-02-07 Thread aaron morton
> 'nodetool -pr repair' Assuming nodetool repair -pr If there is no write activity all reads (at any CL level) will return the same value after a successful repair. If there is write activity there is always a possibility of inconsistencies, and so only access where R + W >N (e.g. QUORUM + Q

are CFs consistent after a repair

2013-02-07 Thread Brian Jeltema
I'm confused about consistency. I have a 6-node group (RF=3) and I have a table that was known to be inconsistent across replicas (a Hadoop app was sensitive to this). So a did a 'nodetool -pr repair' on every node in the cluster. After the repairs were complete, the Hadoop app still indicated