On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:30 PM, aaron morton wrote:
> If this is intended behavior, could somebody please point me to where this
> is
> documented?
>
> It is intended.
It is not in fact. We should either refuse the query as "yet
unsupported" or we should do the right thing, but returning nothin
> If this is intended behavior, could somebody please point me to where this is
> documented?
It is intended.
The docs don't make it totally clear though:
syntax is:
{ = | < | > | <= | >= }
IN ( [,...])
http://www.datastax.com/docs/1.1/references/cql/SELECT
the key_value means only the pr
Hello,
Does CQL's IN(...) predicate have the same meaning as SQL's IN(...)? I'm
asking this, because I get results that I cannot explain:
cqlsh:xpl1> select * from t1 where col2='bar1';
pk | col1 | col2
--+--+--
pk1b | foo1 | bar1
pk1 | foo1 | bar1
pk1a | foo1 | bar1
pk1c | f
