Because it is extremely well-understood, handles a lot of the
reliability needs itself, and nothing more is required for the
application.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:02 PM, ChingShen wrote:
> Why? What reasons did you choose TCP?
>
> Shen
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
Why? What reasons did you choose TCP?
Shen
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> In 0.6 gossip is over TCP.
>
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Ashwin Jayaprakash
> wrote:
> > Hey guys! I have a simple question. I'm a casual observer, not a real
> > Cassandra user yet. So, ex
use OpenPGM (http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/) as an alternative? But
> they don't have any Java bindings yet.
>
> ZeroMQ (http://www.zeromq.org/) uses this.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n2.nabble.com/Unreliable-transport-layer-tp4684470p48142
Or, use OpenPGM (http://code.google.com/p/openpgm/) as an alternative? But
they don't have any Java bindings yet.
ZeroMQ (http://www.zeromq.org/) uses this.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Unreliable-transport-layer-tp4684470p4814206.html
Sent from the cassan
