No. He's saying that one of the points of mmaping the data files is
that the OS is free to only keep files that are actually used, in the
page cache. Since this data is backed by an actual file swap is not
involved.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Jason Baker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
>
> In many regards Cassandra automatically does the correct thing. Other then
> the costs of the bloom filters for the table size being in ram, if you never
> read or write to those sstables and you are not reusing the row key, the OS
> will
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:07 AM, aaron morton wrote:
> There's not much to do other than turn off the caches (which you have done)
> and leave it alone.
>
> If you want to poke around perhaps look at the compaction settings (from
> CLI help):
>
> - max_compaction_threshold: The maximum number of
There's not much to do other than turn off the caches (which you have done) and
leave it alone.
If you want to poke around perhaps look at the compaction settings (from CLI
help):
- max_compaction_threshold: The maximum number of SSTables allowed before a
minor compaction is forced. Default is
I have a column family that I'm using to archive records. They're mostly
kept around for historical purposes. Aside from that, they're mostly
considered deleted. It's probably going to be very rare that anyone reads
from this table *ever*. I don't really even write to it that much.
Does anyone
