3.0.15 is likely fine for production, but like any database, you should
test it with your data in a test environment prior to deploying to prod.
I haven't personally used 3.11.1, though the important parts are likely
very similar to 3.0.15.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Herbert Fischer <
her
pany Registration Information.
>
> From: shini gupta [mailto:gupta.sh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 2:30 AM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Fwd: Stable Cassandra 3.x version for production
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> Which version of Cassandra 3.x is stable and production-ready?
>
> Regards
..@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2017 2:30 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: Stable Cassandra 3.x version for production
Hi
Which version of Cassandra 3.x is stable and production-ready?
Regards
ent: Dienstag, 07. November 2017 14:35
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stable Cassandra 3.x version for production
I know that people usually prefers to use the 3.0.x branch because that's the
one that is underneath DSE.
I've never heard of anyone using Cassandra > 3.0.x on produ
DSE is already pushing 3.11 in 5.1
If you're going into 3.x either 3.11.1 or 3.0.15. I would recommend 3.11.1
to take advantage of a couple of features (ex: Slow query log) that you
don't have on 3.0.
If you're stable on 2.x and you don't need any new feature, you can leave
it there safely (altho
I know that people usually prefers to use the 3.0.x branch because that's
the one that is underneath DSE.
I've never heard of anyone using Cassandra > 3.0.x on production.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM, shini gupta wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> Which version of Cassandra 3.x is stable and production-
Hi
Which version of Cassandra 3.x is stable and production-ready?
Regards
