I was perhaps a bit snarky with you there Marc; my apologies. There's a history
of some tension between Cassandra and Scylla and a user coming from an
unrelated community knowingly asking for free support / time / energy from an
unrelated project while holding back that context rubbed me the wro
fr not sharing the
> knowledge of a Cassandra item.
>
>
>
> Time to unsubscribe
>
>
>
> *From:* Josh McKenzie
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 1, 2025 1:47 PM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Recycled-Commitlogs
>
>
>
> EXTERNAL
>
> Can
: Tuesday, July 1, 2025 1:47 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recycled-Commitlogs
EXTERNAL
Can anyone explain WHAT they are?
Yes Marc. The Scylla community. That's what we're trying to tell you.
As far as anyone on this list seems to think, this isn't related to Apache
Cas
> On 2025/06/27 13:13:17 Marc Hoppins wrote:
>> > Well, I do have a confession to make. It is actually scyllaDB and the
>> > latest version. As it is (generally) Cassandra compatible I naturally
>> > assumed that these items were in both applications.
>> >
@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recycled-Commitlogs
EXTERNAL
As it is (generally) Cassandra compatible I naturally assumed that these items
were in both applications.
For future reference - it's "generally CQL API compatible". That's the extent
of it.
It's analogous to drivin
ly) Cassandra compatible I naturally
> > assumed that these items were in both applications.
> >
> > Marc
> >
> > From: Jeff Jirsa
> > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 7:35 PM
> > To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> > Cc: user@cassandra.apache.org
> &g
atible I naturally assumed that
> these items were in both applications.
>
> Marc
>
> From: Jeff Jirsa
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 7:35 PM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Cc: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Recycled-Commitlogs
>
> EXTER
atible I naturally assumed that
> these items were in both applications.
>
> Marc
>
> From: Jeff Jirsa
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2025 7:35 PM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Cc: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Recycled-Commitlogs
>
> EXTER
@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recycled-Commitlogs
EXTERNAL
What version of cassandra is this?
Recycling segments was a thing from like 1.1 to 2.2 but really very different
in modern versions (and cdc / point in time backup mirrors some of the concepts
around hanging onto segments)
Knowing the
> cdc / point in time backup mirrors some of the concepts around hanging onto
> segments
That was my first thought but we never prepended "Recycled-" on the front of
that that I know of.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025, at 1:35 PM, Jeff Jirsa wrote:
>
> What version of cassandra is this?
>
> Recycling s
What version of cassandra is this? Recycling segments was a thing from like 1.1 to 2.2 but really very different in modern versions (and cdc / point in time backup mirrors some of the concepts around hanging onto segments)Knowing the version would be super helpful though Is this … 1.2? 2.0?On Jun 2
I guess it comes from the archive of commitlogs ，just guess~~~
But I think we need the cassandra's version and commitlog's configuration
in cassandra.yaml, and commitlog_archiving.properties to determine this.
Marc Hoppins 于2025年6月26日周四 16:08写道：
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am not a data person but a Linux
12 matches
Mail list logo
