Then the wiki is incorrect.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Aaron Blew wrote:
> That makes sense. It still seems to conflict with what's stated in the
> wiki:
> "...the remaining N-2 replicas, if any, are placed on the first nodes along
> the ring in the *same* rack as the first"
> -Aaron
>
>
That makes sense. It still seems to conflict with what's stated in the
wiki:
"...the remaining N-2 replicas, if any, are placed on the first nodes along
the ring in the *same* rack as the first"
-Aaron
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> You're mis-parsing the first. I
You're mis-parsing the first. It says "place one replica in a
different datacenter, and the others on different racks in the same
one," where the antecedent of "one" is "datacenter," not rack.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Blew, Aaron wrote:
> The first text says the N-2 replicas are placed
The first text says the N-2 replicas are placed in the same rack while the
second text indicates that the N-2 replicas will be placed in different racks.
Am I missing something?
-Aaron
---
Aaron Blew -
Sr. Infrastructure Engineer | The Automator
iovation - The Power of Reputation™
aaron.b...@io
I'm not sure what parts of these you think are in conflict.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Blew, Aaron wrote:
> Hello,
> I was browsing the docs for the RackAware replication strategy and saw this
> on the wiki:
>
> "RackAwareStrategy: replica 2 is placed in the first node along the ring the
Hello,
I was browsing the docs for the RackAware replication strategy and saw this on
the wiki:
"RackAwareStrategy: replica 2 is placed in the first node along the ring the
belongs in another data center than the first; the remaining N-2 replicas, if
any, are placed on the first nodes along the
