, of course.
>
>From:Wz1975 [mailto:wz1...@yahoo.com]
>Sent: 14 октября 2013 г. 7:20
>To: user@cassandra.apache.org
>
>Subject: Re: one big cluster vs multiple smaller clusters
>Importance: Low
>
>we have choices of making one big cluster vs a few small clusters. I am trying
&g
gt; -Wei
>
> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
>
>
> Original message
> Subject: Re: one big cluster vs multiple smaller clusters
> From: Jon Haddad
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> CC:
>
>
>
> This is a pretty vague questio
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: one big cluster vs multiple smaller clusters
Importance: Low
we have choices of making one big cluster vs a few small clusters. I am trying
to get pros and cons for both options in genera.
Thanks.
-Wei
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&a
we have choices of making one big cluster vs a few small clusters. I am trying
to get pros and cons for both options in genera.
Thanks.
-Wei
Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
Original message
Subject: Re: one big cluster vs multiple smaller clusters
From: Jon Ha
This is a pretty vague question. What are you trying to achieve?
On Oct 12, 2013, at 9:05 PM, Wei Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
> As we bring more use cases to Cassandra, we have been thinking about the best
> way to host it. Let's say we will have 15 physical machines available, we can
> use all of them
