many thanks for your work on this. Just out of
>>> curiosity, how does this compare to the DSE Cassandra with embedded Solr?
>>> Do they provide very similar functionality? Is there a list of obvious pros
>>> and cons of one versus the other?
>>>
>>>
&
ks for your work on this. Just out of
>> curiosity, how does this compare to the DSE Cassandra with embedded Solr?
>> Do they provide very similar functionality? Is there a list of obvious pros
>> and cons of one versus the other?
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
h embedded Solr? Do they
> provide very similar functionality? Is there a list of obvious pros and cons
> of one versus the other?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
> From: Andres de la Peña [mailto:adelap...@stratio.com
> <mailto:adelap...@stratio.com>]
&g
list of obvious pros
> and cons of one versus the other?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Andres de la Peña [mailto:adelap...@stratio.com]
> *Sent:* 13 June 2015 13:20
>
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Lucene index
:* Andres de la Peña [mailto:adelap...@stratio.com]
*Sent:* 13 June 2015 13:20
*To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Lucene index plugin for Apache Cassandra
Thanks for showing interest.
Faceting is not yet supported, but it is in our roadmap. Our goal is to add
to Cassandra as many
rt faceting and other Solr functionality?
>
>
>
> Mohammed
>
>
>
> *From:* Andres de la Peña [mailto:adelap...@stratio.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 12, 2015 3:43 AM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Lucene index plugin for Apache Cassandra
>
>
&
The plugin looks cool. Thank you for open sourcing it.
Does it support faceting and other Solr functionality?
Mohammed
From: Andres de la Peña [mailto:adelap...@stratio.com]
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:43 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene index plugin for Apache Cassandra
I really appreciate your interest
Well, the first recommendation is to not use it unless you need it, because
a properly Cassandra denormalized model is almost always preferable to
indexing. Lucene indexing is a good option when there is no viable
denormalization alternative. This is the case of r
Seems like an interesting tool!
What operational recommendations would you make to users of this tool
(Extra hardware capacity, extra metrics to monitor, etc)?
Regards,
Carlos Juzarte Rolo
Cassandra Consultant
Pythian - Love your data
rolo@pythian | Twitter: cjrolo | Linkedin: *linkedin.com/in
Unfortunately, we don't have published any benchmarks yet, but we have
plans to do it as soon as possible. However, you can expect a similar
behavior as those of Elasticsearch or Solr, with some overhead due to the
need for indexing both the Cassandra's row key and the partition's token.
You can al
Looks awesome, do you have any examples/benchmarks of using these indexes
for various cluster sizes e.g. 20 nodes, 60 nodes, 100s+?
On 10 June 2015 at 09:08, Andres de la Peña wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the release of Cassandra 2.1.6, Stratio is glad to present its open
> source Lucene-based impl
11 matches
Mail list logo