On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> If you're not using prepared statements you won't get any token aware
> routing. That's an even better option than round robin since it reduces the
> number of nodes involved.
Fair statement. Thrust of my comment is "don't send all conne
If you're not using prepared statements you won't get any token aware
routing. That's an even better option than round robin since it reduces the
number of nodes involved.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:48 PM Robert Coli wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Jaydeep Chovatia <
> chovatia.jayd...@g
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Jaydeep Chovatia <
chovatia.jayd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have created different tables and my test application reads/writes with
> CL=QUORUM. Under load I found that my one node is taking more
> resources (double CPU) than the other two. I have also verified that
Hi,
I have three node cluster with RF=1 (only one Datacenter) with following
size:
Datacenter: DC1
===
Status=Up/Down
|/ State=Normal/Leaving/Joining/Moving
-- AddressLoad Tokens Owns Host ID
Rack
UN4.02 GB1 33.3%RAC1
UN4.05 GB1
