Thanks for the answer.
I hadn't realised requests were made in parallel, I first noticed it
when multiget's took linear time in machines with high loads. Looking
at the code led me to the previous conclusion (N gets for multiget for
N keys). I agree it would take a major overhaul of the code to cha
2011/11/4 Filipe Gonçalves :
> Multiget slice queries seem to fetch rows sequentially, at least
> fromwhat I understood of the sources. This means the node that
> receives amultiget of N keys does N get operations to the other nodes
> in thecluster to fetch the remaining keys.
> Am I right? Is this
Multiget slice queries seem to fetch rows sequentially, at least
fromwhat I understood of the sources. This means the node that
receives amultiget of N keys does N get operations to the other nodes
in thecluster to fetch the remaining keys.
Am I right? Is this the way multiget works internally?
Als
