On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Prabath Abeysekara <
prabathabeysek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> First of all, apologies if the $subject was discussed previously in this
> list before. I've already gone through quite a few email trails on this but
> still couldn't find a convincing answer which really
Another nice resource...
http://www.ecyrd.com/cassandracalculator/
Yes your thinking is correct.
This article from TLP sums it all up beautifully
http://thelastpickle.com/blog/2011/06/13/Down-For-Me.html
Ben Bromhead
Instaclustr | www.instaclustr.com | @instaclustr | +61 415 936 359
On 18 Jun 2014, at 4:18 pm, Prabath Abeysekara
wrote:
> Sorry, the title o
Sorry, the title of this thread has to be "*Minimum cluster size to survive
a single node failure*".
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Prabath Abeysekara <
prabathabeysek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> First of all, apologies if the $subject was discussed previously in this
> list befor
Hi Everyone,
First of all, apologies if the $subject was discussed previously in this
list before. I've already gone through quite a few email trails on this but
still couldn't find a convincing answer which really made me raise this
question again here in this list.
If my understanding is correc
