> . Is there a better way to solve this in real time.
Not really. If however you can send a row level delete before the insert you
dont need to read first. Of course that deletes all the other data :)
If you create a secondary index on a column value, the index will be updated
when you change th
Hi All,
I am using property of columns i.e., they are in sorted order to store sort
orders (I believe everyone else is also using the same).
But if I want to maintain sort order on a property, whose value changes, I
would have to perform read and delete operation. Is there a better way to
solve th
