> > Question 2: is this a sane strategy?
>
> On its face my answer is "not... really"?
I'd go with a solid no.
Just because the the three independent clusters have a schema that looks the
same does not make them the same. The schema is a versioned document, you will
not be able to merge them
>
> On its face my answer is "not... really"? What do you view yourself as
> getting with this technique versus using built in replication? As an
> example, you lose the ability to do LOCAL_QUORUM vs EACH_QUORUM
> consistency level operations?
Doing replication manually sounds like a recipe for t
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Faraaz Sareshwala
wrote:
> Each datacenter will have a cassandra cluster with a separate set of seeds
> specific to that datacenter. However, the cluster name will be the same.
>
> Question 1: is this enough to guarentee that the three datacenters will have
> dist
My company is planning on deploying cassandra to three separate datacenters.
Each datacenter will have a cassandra cluster with a separate set of seeds
specific to that datacenter. However, the cluster name will be the same.
Question 1: is this enough to guarentee that the three datacenters will h
