10 writes / second could even be done with every sql/nosql solution, even with
plain files.
So I think the storage choosen should be the one optimized for the queries you
wanna have.
Sent from my iPhone
On 06.08.2010, at 05:54, Sal Fuentes wrote:
> Would you care to elaborate?
>
> On Thu, A
Would you care to elaborate?
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Mark wrote:
>
> MongoDB may be a better choice for this?
>
--
Salvador Fuentes Jr.
It sounds like you would be fine doing what you propose.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Rui Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> first of all, I have read the Cassandra Hardware requirements page on
> Cassandra wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/CassandraHardware .
>
> I am currently in a simple proj
On 8/5/10 8:01 AM, Rui Silva wrote:
Hi all,
first of all, I have read the Cassandra Hardware requirements page on
Cassandra wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/CassandraHardware .
I am currently in a simple project that, fetches data from a message
broker. That data can be thought as logging
Hi all,
first of all, I have read the Cassandra Hardware requirements page on
Cassandra wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/CassandraHardware .
I am currently in a simple project that, fetches data from a message
broker. That data can be thought as logging data, about a system user
usage. I ne
