>
> Sort of. There's some fine print, such as the 50% number is only if
> you're manually forcing major compactions, which is not recommended,
> but a bigger thing to know is that 1.0 will introduce "leveled
> compaction" [1] inspired by leveldb. The free space requirement will
> then be a small
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jacob, Arun wrote:
> we need to cap data size at 50% of total node storage capacity for
> compaction
Sort of. There's some fine print, such as the 50% number is only if
you're manually forcing major compactions, which is not recommended,
but a bigger thing to kno
dra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:54:56 -0700
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org<mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>"
mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Cassandra Node Requirements
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:54 PM,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Jacob, Arun wrote:
> I'm trying to determine a node configuration for Cassandra. From what I've
> been able to determine from reading around:
>
>
>1. we need to cap data size at 50% of total node storage capacity for
>compaction
>2. with RF=3, that mea
I'm trying to determine a node configuration for Cassandra. From what I've been
able to determine from reading around:
1. we need to cap data size at 50% of total node storage capacity for
compaction
2. with RF=3, that means that I need to effectively assume that I have 1/6th
of total stor
