In the absence of streaming, how does one retrieve a large result set in
CQL3? E.g., to use the same example:
> CREATE TABLE bug_test (a int, b int, c int, d int, e int, f text, PRIMARY
> KEY (a, b, c, d, e) );
> with some data in it:
>
> SELECT * FROM bug_test;
>
> Results:
>
> a | b | c | d | e |
The short answer is yes, we are looking into adding streaming of
results to solve that problem
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4415).
--
Sylvain
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Josep Blanquer wrote:
> Thank Sylvain,
>
> The main argument for this is pagination. Let me try to e
Thank Sylvain,
The main argument for this is pagination. Let me try to explain the use
cases, and compare it to RDBMS for better illustration:
1- Right now, Cassandra doesn't stream the requests, so large resultsets
are a royal pain in the neck to deal with. I.e., if I have a range_slice,
or eve
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Josep Blanquer
wrote:
> is there some way to express that in CQL3? something logically equivalent to
>
> SELECT * FROM bug_test WHERE a:b:c:d:e > 1:1:1:1:2??
No, there isn't. Not currently at least. But feel free of course to
open a ticket/request on
https:/
Hi,
I am confused as to what is the way to specify column slices for composite
type CFs using CQL3.
I first thought that the way to do so was to use the very ugly and
unintuitive syntax of constructing the PK prefix with equalities, except
the last part of the composite type. But, now, after see
