Re: C* on Fusion IO

2014-11-06 Thread Kevin Burton
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Christopher Brodt wrote: > Yep. The "trouble" with FIOs is that they almost completely remove your > disk throughput problems, so then you're constrained by CPU. Concurrent > compactors and concurrent writes are two params that come to mind but there > are likely o

Re: C* on Fusion IO

2014-11-06 Thread Kevin Burton
This is definitely a first world problem.. having databases that are CPU bound :-P On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:05 PM, jeeyoung kim wrote: > I've been running with FIOs and we've been CPU bound most of the time. But > I'm not using native transport yet, and is hoping that it would make things > fast

Re: C* on Fusion IO

2014-11-06 Thread Christopher Brodt
Yep. The "trouble" with FIOs is that they almost completely remove your disk throughput problems, so then you're constrained by CPU. Concurrent compactors and concurrent writes are two params that come to mind but there are likely others. @kevin. I hear you. 5TB is sort of a maximum that DataStax

Re: C* on Fusion IO

2014-11-06 Thread jeeyoung kim
I've been running with FIOs and we've been CPU bound most of the time. But I'm not using native transport yet, and is hoping that it would make things faster. On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Christopher Brodt wrote: > You should get pretty great performance with those FusionIO cards. One > thin

Re: C* on Fusion IO

2014-11-06 Thread Kevin Burton
This was one of my biggest issues too. We were expecting to be at 5-10 nodes to start with and then 20-40 nodes in 60-90 days. But this means we can run all of our database on 1 box :-P … but realistically two. Which means if one box goes offline then I’m at 50% capacity. That and I don’t even

Re: C* on Fusion IO

2014-11-06 Thread Christopher Brodt
You should get pretty great performance with those FusionIO cards. One thing I watch out for whenever scaling Cassandra vertically is compaction times, which probably won't matter here. However, you have to take into account that you lose some resiliency to failures with less nodes. On Thu, Nov 6,

Re: C* on Fusion IO

2014-11-06 Thread Russ Bradberry
I've heard of people running dense nodes (8+ TB) using fusion I/O, but with 10GBe connections. I mean why buy a Ferrari and never leave first gear? As far as saturating the network goes, I guess that all depends on your workload, and how often you need to repair. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 6

C* on Fusion IO

2014-11-06 Thread Kevin Burton
We’re looking at switching data centers and they’re offering pretty aggressive pricing on boxes with fusion IO cards. 2x 1.2TB Fusion IO 128GB RAM 20 cores. now.. this isn’t the typical cassandra box. Most people are running multiple nodes to scale out vs scale vertically. But these boxes are p