Thanks Rob.
Anyway, Ideally for a new node to join with ~50GB data of it's share, it
should be done in couple of minutes or hour tops, right?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Pranay Agarwal
> wrote:
>
>> Also, the very fact the new nodes ge
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Pranay Agarwal
wrote:
> Also, the very fact the new nodes get some data (~10gb) and then get
> stuck, the configurations and process I am using must be correct, and there
> is no immediate fix besides upgrade the version?
>
That is correct, it sounds like a corre
Thanks, will do that.
Also, the very fact the new nodes get some data (~10gb) and then get stuck,
the configurations and process I am using must be correct, and there is no
immediate fix besides upgrade the version?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Pranay Agarwal
wrote:
> I guess now, I have decide it's better to upgrade to 2.1.6+ or downgrade
> to stable release and safe way to do that.
>
You can't downgrade across major versions, you'd have to read out
everything from the "new" cluster and write it to a d
Thanks a lot Rob.
I guess now, I have decide it's better to upgrade to 2.1.6+ or downgrade to
stable release and safe way to do that.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Pranay Agarwal
> wrote:
>
>> What do you mean by point 3? Also, by doing
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Pranay Agarwal
wrote:
> What do you mean by point 3? Also, by doing one at a time, does it mean
> wait till nodetool status of the new node is UN from UJ?
>
point 3 is "look at nodetool status/nodetool ring/nodetool info/etc. on
other cluster nodes and make sure
Also, typically how long does it take for a node to join? I have in total 1
TB of data in 15 nodes cassandra cluster.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Pranay Agarwal
wrote:
> Thank Rahul, you are right. Unless the node complete joins the ring, there
> is no data dependency on them.
>
>
> On Fri
Thank Rahul, you are right. Unless the node complete joins the ring, there
is no data dependency on them.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Rahul Neelakantan wrote:
> You won't lose data unless you have run nodetool cleanup on the existing
> nodes.
>
> Rahul
>
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:16 PM, Pran
You won't lose data unless you have run nodetool cleanup on the existing nodes.
Rahul
> On Mar 19, 2015, at 9:16 PM, Pranay Agarwal wrote:
>
> Also, the new nodes (3 of them, in UJ state) are showing some data size
> (~10g). Is there any data loss chances with stopping the cassandra on them?
Also, the new nodes (3 of them, in *UJ state*) are showing some data size
(~10g). Is there any data loss chances with stopping the cassandra on them?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Pranay Agarwal
wrote:
> Thanks Rob, You are right. I am using ReleaseVersion: 2.1.0
>
> What do you mean by point
Thanks Rob, You are right. I am using ReleaseVersion: 2.1.0
What do you mean by point 3? Also, by doing one at a time, does it mean
wait till nodetool status of the new node is UN from UJ?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Pranay Agarwal
> w
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Pranay Agarwal
wrote:
> I have 14 nodes cassandra cluster, each node as around 50gb of data. I
> added 3 new nodes to the cluster and I can see the status as *UJ *for the
> new nodes. They have been in that for almost a day now and their data size
> seems to be sa
Hi,
I have 14 nodes cassandra cluster, each node as around 50gb of data. I
added 3 new nodes to the cluster and I can see the status as *UJ *for the
new nodes. They have been in that for almost a day now and their data size
seems to be same as well. There is almost no CPU or disk usage either on
t
13 matches
Mail list logo
