sting
complexity.
Les
From: Robert Coli [mailto:rc...@eventbrite.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 5:10 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ad-hoc queries question
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Hartzman, Leslie
mailto:leslie.d.hartz...@medtronic.com>> wrote:
Thanks Rob. I t
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Hartzman, Leslie <
leslie.d.hartz...@medtronic.com> wrote:
> Thanks Rob. I thought that might have been the situation but wasn’t
> sure. So does this negate the use of cqlsh to do this then? I’d hate to
> have to provide custom code to support ad-hoc queries.
>
T
Cool! Thanks for the suggestions.
From: Peter Lin [mailto:wool...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 4:52 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ad-hoc queries question
there are several ways of handling these types of use cases. Some people take a
soft real-time approach by
e deeper into that. I’m hoping that the de-normalized nature of
> things would obviate the need for complex subquery-type of operations.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Peter Lin [mailto:wool...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 20, 2013 4:30 PM
>
> *To:* user@ca
normalized nature of things
would obviate the need for complex subquery-type of operations.
From: Peter Lin [mailto:wool...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 4:30 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ad-hoc queries question
What do you mean by ad-hoc queries?
Most NoSql data
the use of cqlsh to do this then? I’d hate to
> have to provide custom code to support ad-hoc queries.
>
> ** **
>
> Les
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Robert Coli [mailto:rc...@eventbrite.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 20, 2013 4:06 PM
> *To:* user@cassan
4:06 PM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ad-hoc queries question
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Hartzman, Leslie
mailto:leslie.d.hartz...@medtronic.com>> wrote:
So are ad-hoc queries more awkward or not feasible?
Yes.
To expand slightly, you will probably end up querying multipl
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Hartzman, Leslie <
leslie.d.hartz...@medtronic.com> wrote:
> So are ad-hoc queries more awkward or not feasible?
>
Yes.
To expand slightly, you will probably end up querying multiple
columnfamilies and doing the ad-hoc JOIN-esque aspect in application code.
=Ro
I know that for NoSQL the idea is to figure out your queries beforehand and
then plan your data architecture to support them. And this typically is
accomplished with a denormalized database.
So are ad-hoc queries more awkward or not feasible?
Thanks.
Les
[CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE]
