this behavior as well with 0.6, heap usage graphs look almost
>>> identical. The GC is a noticeable bottleneck, we’ve tried jdku19 and jrockit
>>> vm’s. It basically kills any kind of soft real time behavior.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masood
noticeable bottleneck, we’ve tried jdku19 and jrockit
>> vm’s. It basically kills any kind of soft real time behavior.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masoodmortaz...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, April 19, 2010 4:15 AM
>> *To:* user@cassandra.
Monday, April 19, 2010 4:15 AM
> *To:* user@cassandra.apache.org; d...@cassandra.apache.org
> *Subject:* 0.6 insert performance Re: [RELEASE] 0.6.1
>
>
>
> I wonder if anyone can use:
>
> * Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
> to confirm this:
> http://www.slidesh
It's hard to tell from those slides, but it looks like the slowdown
doesn't hit until after several GCs.
Perhaps this is compaction kicking in, not GCs? Definitely the extra
I/O + CPU load from compaction will cause a drop in throughput.
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 6:14 AM, Masood Mortazavi
wrote:
l 19, 2010 4:15 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org; d...@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: 0.6 insert performance Re: [RELEASE] 0.6.1
I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
to confirm this:
http://www.slideshare.net/schubertzhang/cassandra-060-insert-throughput
ere things work out.
From: Masood Mortazavi [mailto:masoodmortaz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 6:15 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org; d...@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: 0.6 insert performance Re: [RELEASE] 0.6.1
I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSAND
I wonder if anyone can use:
* Add logging of GC activity (CASSANDRA-813)
to confirm this:
http://www.slideshare.net/schubertzhang/cassandra-060-insert-throughput
- m.
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> Hot on the trails of 0.6.0 comes our latest, 0.6.1. This stable point
