Quoting Eric Evans :
> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 19:17 +0100, dnalls...@taz.qinetiq.com wrote:
> > Just to illustrate; the typical injection pattern is:
> > select * from users where KEY='jsmith'; DROP COLUMNFAMILY 'users';
>
> No, each CQL query must contain exactly one statement, so this sort of
> a
Quoting Stephen Connolly :
All,
As Stephen said, regardless of the transfer protocol, if the content is parsed,
then there is the potential for attacks.
Just to illustrate; the typical injection pattern is:
String user = getUserName()
String cql = "select * from users where KEY='"+user+"';"
exe
Quoting Yang :
I'd guess that getLong() is not faster because get() probably already benefits
from processor cache etc.
There are two concrete subclasses of ByteBuffer that implement get() -
HeapByteBuffer and DirectByteBuffer (for mapped memory).
It might be possible to optimise the comparison
Quoting Jonathan Ellis On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:12 AM, wrote:
> > I assume there's something wrong with the data (the column has
> validation_class:
> > UTF8Type, so is it because I'm inserting non-UTF8 bytes?) but the exception
> > doesn't explain.
>
> That would do it, but it looks like you've
When attempting to insert a column. I get the following exception:
InvalidRequestException(why="[Keyspace][ColumnFamily][9cc58234708d] =
[6a53ac0452f67acd71b35463d475762b7f69cc0ea7f9e0cb0ca24f0e45170d48dafae04bf7b966fa75c7fb2bad0eace0ff23b265e8b0e35c7b0bbc2a516bb75b2007eb35ab1308b8c646428e0491840
Someone asked a while ago whether Cassandra was vulnerable to injection attacks:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5998838/nosql-injection-php-phpcassa-cassandra
With Thrift, the answer was 'no'.
With CQL, presumably the situation is different, at least until prepared
statements are possible (
I had a strange problem recently where I was unable to set the value of a column
to '0' (it always returned '1') but setting it to other values worked fine:
[default@Test] set Urls['rowkey']['status']='1';
Value inserted.
[default@Test] get Urls['rowkey'];
=> (column=status, value=1, timestamp=130
Hi all,
I'm trying to implement a priority queue for holding a large number (millions)
of items that need to be processed in time order. My solution works - but gets
slower and slower until performance is unacceptable - even with a small number
of items.
Each item essentially needs to be popped
