Praveen, if you search "Read is slower in 2.1.6 than 2.0.14" in this forum,
you can find another thread I sent a while ago. The perf test I did
indicated that read is slower for 2.1.6 than 2.0.14 so we stayed with
2.0.14.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Peddi, Praveen wrote:
> Thanks Jeff for y
ative an I think that Datastax driver allow CQL /
> native protocol only, you should be good to go. Basically does your clients
> use port 9042 (by default) ?
>
> C*heers,
>
> Alain
>
>
> 2015-06-25 17:36 GMT+02:00 Zhiyan Shao :
>
>> Thanks Alain,
>>
>>
tp://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/cassandra-2-1-now-over-50-faster)
>
> BTW interesting benchmark, but having the right conf is interesting. Also
> you might want to go to 2.1.7 that mainly fixes a memory leak afaik.
>
> C*heers,
>
> Alain
> Le 25 juin 2015 01:23, "Zhiyan Shao
Hi,
we recently experimented read performance on both versions and found read
is slower in 2.1.6. Here is our setup:
1. Machines: 3 physical hosts. Each node has 24 cores CPU, 256G memory and
8x600GB SAS disks with raid 1.
2. Replica is 3 and a billion rows of data is inserted.
3. Key cache capac
