Re: Decommission faster than bootstrap

Do you think that not to run cleanup operation after bootstrapping a node can affect the bootstrap time of a subsequent node? I mean, keys not removed can somehow affect a bootstrap operation? Thanks. Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM

Re: Decommission faster than bootstrap

ld be similar, assuming that data streaming is the most time-consuming task and that the amount of data streamed is similar. Thanks in advance for all comments. Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:48 PM,

Decommission faster than bootstrap

data streaming from (or to) other node, right? Thanks in advance. Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP

TimeoutException and keyspace exceptions

an option for me. Other info: rpc_timeout_in_ms: 3 thrift_framed_transport_size_in_mb: 60 thrift_max_message_length_in_mb: 64 Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP

Re: General doubts about bootstrap

cassandra works. Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Eric Stevens wrote: > > => Adding a new node between other nodes would avoid running move, but > the ring would be unbalan

Re: General doubts about bootstrap

Thank you very much for you response. Follows my comments about your email. Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Robert Coli wrote: > On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Rodrigo Fe

General doubts about bootstrap

d be gather from other node, ie. the one that properly has the range specified in the scan query? - After decommissioning a node, is it advisable to run cleanup in the remaining nodes? The consequences of not to run are the same of not to run when adding a node? Thank you very mu

Re: nodetool ring showing different 'Load' size

Ok. Thank you all you guys. Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Robert Coli wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Michal Michalski > wrote: > > You can also perform a majo

Re: nodetool ring showing different 'Load' size

Thanks Eric. Is there a way to start manually compaction operations? I'm thinking about doing after loading data and before start run phase of the benchmark. Thanks. Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP On Mon, Jun 17,

nodetool ring showing different 'Load' size

e workload depending on the load (CPU). Thanks in advance for any help. Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP

Exception when running YCSB and Cassandra

INFO 00:54:07,448 Thrift API version: 19.32.0* Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP

Nodes down

% 85070591730234615865843651857942052864 10.114.249.169 datacenter1 rack1 Down Normal ? 16.67% 113427455640312821154458202477256070484 Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP

Broken pipe when variating a lot number of connections

java:431)* * at com.yahoo.ycsb.ClientThread.run(ClientThread.java:105)* Att. *Rodrigo Felix de Almeida* LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará Project Manager MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP