ng within the row.
>
> Thanks Philip!
>
> On Saturday, March 16, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Philip O'Toole wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Josh Dzielak wrote:
>
> Thanks Philip. I see where you are coming from; that'd be much simpler and
> avoid these bumps.
s within a given range by performing the modulo math
on the requested time range (you must choose the interval as part of
your design, and stick with it). You do not need a secondary index.
>
> On Saturday, March 16, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Philip O'Toole wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2013
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Philip O'Toole wrote:
> It is a mistake, IMHO, to use the timestamp contained within the event
> to generate the time-based UUID. While it will work, it suffers from
> exactly the problem you describe. Instead, use the clock of the host
> syste
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Ariel Weisberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This has been solved a couple of times, and always pretty much the same way.
> Encode the id of the worker generating the id into the timestamp, and as you
> mentioned, maintain a counter for each millisecond.
>
> https://github.com/
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Josh Dzielak wrote:
> I have a system where a client sends me arbitrary JSON events containing a
> timestamp at millisecond resolution. The timestamp is used to generate
> column names of type TimeUUIDType.
>
> The problem I run into is this - if I client sends me
You can consider using a WAN optimization appliance such as a Riverbed
Steelhead to significantly speed up your transfers, though that will cost. It
is a common approach to speed up inter-datacenter transfers. Steelheads for the
AWS EC2 cloud are also available.
(Disclaimer: I used to write so
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Hiller, Dean wrote:
> I didn't need to compile it. It is up in the maven repositories as we
>
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.netflix.astyanax/astyanax
Actually, yeah, that's what I ended up doing with my ghetto set up
too, but I did compile my examples
on from
> linux command line ?
I am relatively new to Java and Astyanax too, and created a set up for
exactly this purpose. You can learn what I did here:
http://www.philipotoole.com/bootstrapping-cassandra
Not the most elegant, but I wanted to get some stuff up-and-running quickly.
>
> Tha
Cool - thanks to all for the replies. I believe I have what I need now.
Philip
On Aug 25, 2012, at 12:17 AM, Guillermo Winkler
wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> From http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/ArchitectureOverview
>
> Quorum write: blocks until quorum is reached
>
> By my understanding if you
Hi Derek -- thanks. More inline.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:52:49PM -0600, Derek Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Philip O'Toole wrote:
>
> > But consider this. Say I have a replication factor of 3. I request a
> > QUORUM write, and it fails because t
is very unlikely to
happen in practise, but I want to be sure I understand all this.
Perhaps the documentation would be more correct if the statement read as
"...reflect the most recent SUCCESSFUL write..."?
Thanks,
Philip
--
Philip O'Toole
Senior Developer
Loggly, Inc.
San Francisco, CA
;particular" strings ahead of time? Or only at runtime?
--
Philip O'Toole
Senior Developer
Loggly, Inc.
San Francisco, Calif.
www.loggly.com
12 matches
Mail list logo