ec 9, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Robert Coli wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Nate Yoder wrote:
>
>> I am currently running a 6 node Cassandra 2.1.1 cluster on EC2 using
>> C3.2XLarge nodes which overall is working very well for us. However, after
>> letting it run for
Yoder*
Principal Engineer & Data Scientist, Whistle
415-944-7344 // n...@whistle.com
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Nate Yoder wrote:
> Hi Reynald,
>
> Good idea but I have incremental backups turned off and other than *.db
> files nothing else appears to be in the data dir
ncremental
> backup hard-links each time a new snapshot is created.*
> These backups are stored in directories named "backups" at the same level
> as the "snapshots' directories.
>
> Reynald
>
>
> On 09/12/2014 18:13, Nate Yoder wrote:
>
> Thanks for the a
bout losing a node
> and having only 1 copy of my data available in prod.
>
>
> On Tue Dec 09 2014 at 8:40:37 AM Nate Yoder wrote:
>
>> Thanks Jonathan. So there is nothing too idiotic about my current set-up
>> with 6 boxes each with 256 vnodes each and a RF of 2?
&
1 AM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> You don't need a prime number of nodes in your ring, but it's not a bad
> idea to it be a multiple of your RF when your cluster is small.
>
>
> On Tue Dec 09 2014 at 8:29:35 AM Nate Yoder wrote:
>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> Thanks for t
I found several snapshots on
> my disk recently (which can take a lot of space). So perhaps they are
> automatically generated by some operation? No idea. Regardless, nuking
> those freed up a ton of space for me.
>
> - Ian
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Nate Yoder
Hi All,
I am new to Cassandra so I apologise in advance if I have missed anything
obvious but this one currently has me stumped.
I am currently running a 6 node Cassandra 2.1.1 cluster on EC2 using
C3.2XLarge nodes which overall is working very well for us. However, after
letting it run for a wh
