his was true in version prior to 2.0, but it should still work this
> way. But maybe someone will correct me, if i'm wrong.
> Cheers,
> Olek
>
> 2014-09-10 18:30 GMT+02:00 Michal Budzyn :
> > One insert would be much better e.g. for performance and network latency.
>
One insert would be much better e.g. for performance and network latency.
I wanted to know if there is a significant difference (apart from
additional commit log entry) in the used storage between these 2 use cases.
Is there any serious difference in the used disk and memory storage between
upsert and delete + insert ?
e.g. 2 vs 2A + 2B.
PK ((key), version, c1)
1. INSERT INTO A (key , version , c1, val) values (1, 1, 4711, “X1”)
...
2. INSERT INTO A (key , version , c1, val) values (1, 1, 4711, “X2”)
Vs.
2A
