By the way, my testing cluster are 4 normal PCs with 2GB RAM assigned to
JVM, Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU E3200 2.40GHz. How many concurrent reads/writes
should be reasonable? Or how much memory/CPU usage would be healthy for this
kind of test cluster?
yes, I've tried the patch on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-347, but seems not work for me.
I doubt I am involving another issue with Thrift. If my column value size is
more than 8KB(with thrift php extension enabled), my client has more chances
to get "timed out error". I am still wo
Hi
I am doing some load test with 4 nodes cluster. My client is PHP. I found
some reads/writes were time out no matter how I tuned the parameters. These
time-outs could be caught by client code. My question is: are these
time-outs normal even in production environment? Should they be treated as
no
After many attempts I found this error only occurred when using PHP
thrift_protocol extension. I don't know if there are some parameters that I
could adjust for this issue. By the way, without the ext the speed is
obviously slow.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Ken Sandney wrote:
> I
I am using PHP as client to talk to Cassandra server but I found out if any
column value > 8192 bytes, the client crashed with the following error:
PHP Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'TException' with message 'TSocket:
> timed out reading 1024 bytes from 10.0.0.177:9160' in
> /home/phpcassa/incl
I've tried the patch on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-347 ,
but still got this error:
PHP Fatal error: Uncaught exception 'TException' with message 'TSocket:
> timed out reading 1024 bytes from 10.0.0.169:9160' in
> /home/phpcassa/include/thrift/transport/TSocket.php:266
> Stack tr
> > to
> >> > JVM.
> >> >
> >> > I have a long experience in telecom and embedded software in past ten
> >> > years,
> >> > where need robust programs and small RAM. I want to discuss following
> >> > ideas
> >>
programs and small RAM. I want to discuss following
> ideas
> > with the community:
> >
> > 1. Manage the memory by ourselves: allocate objects/resource (memory) at
> > initiating phase, and assign instances at runtime.
> > 2. Reject the request when be short of re
at 9:32 AM, Schubert Zhang wrote:
>
>> Please also post your jvm-heap and GC options, i.e. the seting in
>> cassandra.in.sh
>> And what about you node hardware?
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Ken Sandney wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>> I am doing
Hi
I am doing a insert test with 9 nodes, the command:
> stress.py -n 10 -t 1000 -c 10 -o insert -i 5 -d
> 10.0.0.1,10.0.0.2.
and 5 of the 9 nodes were cashed, only about 6'500'000 rows were inserted
I checked out the system.log and seems the reason are 'out of memory'. I
don't if th
Cheers
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Jeff Hodges wrote:
> It does, however, include a change the networking layout[1]. It's not
> a simple rolling deploy. You will have to do a full cluster restart to
> upgrade.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-969
> --
> Jeff
>
> On S
.169,10.0.0.185 -o insert
> total,interval_op_rate,interval_key_rate,avg_latency,elapsed_time
> 20,2,2,0.0264923011231,5
>
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Ken Sandney wrote:
> uh, yes, I am using single thread. Thank you for your link, it helps
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 201
r 16, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Ken Sandney wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am just doing a simple insert test with a cluster of two nodes, but
> seems
> > relatively slow: about 1000 rows/second. The test box are normal PC, 2GB
> > RAM, Intel E3200 2.4GHz. Are there any general optimization strategy?
> > Thanks
>
Hi,
I am just doing a simple insert test with a cluster of two nodes, but seems
relatively slow: about 1000 rows/second. The test box are normal PC, 2GB
RAM, Intel E3200 2.4GHz. Are there any general optimization strategy?
Thanks
tried CassFS, but not stable yet, may be a good prototype to start
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Michael Greene
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Ken Sandney wrote:
>
>> a fuse based FS maybe better I guess
>
>
> This has been done, for better or wor
a fuse based FS maybe better I guess
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> You forked Cassandra 0.5 for that?
>
> That's... a strange way to do it.
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Jeff Zhang wrote:
> > We are currently doing such things, and now we are still at the sta
Large files can be split into small blocks, and the size of block can be
tuned. It may increase the complexity of writing such a file system, but can
be for general purpose (not only for relative small files)
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:42 P
17 matches
Mail list logo