Is it worth a back-port or at least switch to asByteArray for 0.8.7? It's a
sizable amount of wasted network traffic and the fix seems pretty safe. (It's
working for me)
Greg Hinkle
On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:32 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Yes. This is one of the things fixed for 1
() or copying just up to the length() into the
ByteBuffer. This means it appears to be wasting on around 40 to 80 bytes on
every message. This really adds up in a big cluster.
It looks like things are different in trunk, but can anyone confirm this bug in
0.8? Thanks.
Greg Hinkle
