I forgot, lets stay on the edge with C* 1.2.* branch ;)
Hvala in lp,
*Alan Ristić*
*w*: personal blog <http://alanristic.wordpress.com/>
*t*: @alanristic <http://twitter.com/alanristic>
* l:* linkedin.com/alanristic <http://si.linkedin.com/in/alanristic/>
*m*: 068 15 73 8
2013/1/28 Sylvain Lebresne
> If you are asking for the key_validation_class of the Index CF, then it's
> the column type that defines it
Sylvain, that was the one I meant, great. Tnx for explanation.
*Alan Ristić*
*m*: 040 423 688
files/sigmod278-silberstein.pdf
)
Lp,
*Alan Ristić*
*w*: www.microhint.com<-- obišči, tnx
* f*: facebook.com/microhint <-- lajkaj, tnx*
*
*t*: twitter.com/microhint_com <-- follow, tnx
*m*: 040 423 688
2013/1/14 Vitalii Tymchyshyn
> Well, for me it was better to use async
wauu! huh...em...wau - can't say anything else. Tnx for insight, it
certanly gives me some "frame" how batch is performing. Tnx a lot.
2013/1/12 Carlos Rolo
> 63k rec
Lp,
*Alan Ristić*
*m*: 040 423 688
insers too much
overload for this kind of work? And what is limiting the number of inserts?
oh..the data model in C* is straightforward - "give me all notifications
for user A"
Lp,
*Alan Ristić*
*m*: 040 423 688
rchar,
...
) ;
CREATE INDEX users__username_idx ON users (username);
Now I know it's a bad practice to model sec. index on 'username' becouse of
uniqness and all but what's the alternative? I'd want 'username' to be
"searchable"?
Tnx,
*Alan Ristić*
*m*: 040 423 688
)
Lp,
Alan Ristić
Lp,
*Alan Ristić*
*m*: 040 423 688
2012/11/8 Alan Ristić
> Hi there!
>
> I'm strugguling to figure out (for quite few hours now) how can I insert
> for example column with TimeUUID name and empy value in CQL3 in fictional
> table. And what's the t
Matt Dennis did here (*Cassandra NYC 2011:
Matt Dennis - Data Modeling Workshop*):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzBJrQZjge0&t=9m45s
Is that even possible in CQL3? Tnx.
Lp,
*Alan Ristić*
