That aside. Can anyone explain WHAT they are? If they were done away with in
Cassandra then they must have been surplus to requirements. In which case, why
have them originally? They must have been there for some reason.
From: Josh McKenzie
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2025 4:16 PM
To: user@cassandra
> As it is (generally) Cassandra compatible I naturally assumed that these
> items were in both applications.
For future reference - it's "generally CQL API compatible". That's the extent
of it.
It's analogous to driving a make/model of one car and taking it to a completely
different unrelated