It is fixed in 3.11.2 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13916
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 02:10 prachirath72 wrote:
> Thanks Jonathan,
> Is there a ticket/bugid to remove this openjdk WARN.
> Want to have a look .
>
>
> Original message
> From: Jonathan Haddad
> Dat
Thanks Jonathan,Is there a ticket/bugid to remove this openjdk WARN.Want to
have a look .
Original message From: Jonathan Haddad
Date: 10/10/18 10:46 AM (GMT-05:00) To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject:
Re: openjdk for cassandra production cluster
The warning should be rem
I’m using OpenJDK on version 3.10 (rehl 7.3) in Production and have the warning
in the logs. I have a stable system, I think you can ignore it.
From: Jonathan Haddad [mailto:j...@jonhaddad.com]
Sent: 10 October 2018 15:46
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: openjdk for cassandra production
The warning should be removed (if it hasn’t already), it’s unnecessary at
this point
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 7:41 AM Prachi Rath wrote:
> HI users,
> I have created a cassandra cluster with openjdk 1.8.0_181
> version.(cassandra 2.1.17)
> started each node, cluster looks healthy,but in the log
HI users,
I have created a cassandra cluster with openjdk 1.8.0_181
version.(cassandra 2.1.17)
started each node, cluster looks healthy,but in the log files saw the WARN
message below:
WARN [main] 2014-01-28 06:02:17,861 CassandraDaemon.java (line 155) OpenJDK
is not recommended. Please upgrade t
Hi All,
In our production system we have a secondary index we would like to drop. Our
application has been changed to no longer use this index, and generally all
read activity stopped on this several weeks ago. However, in cfstats we do see
a tiny amount of reads still being registered (Local r
Hi Ricardo,
Yes no harm in executing upgradesstables multiple times.
Regarding the aggregate functions, you mentioned the data is pre-aggregated
in buckets.
Does that mean the records which are to be used in aggregate function are
part of a single partition.
In my opinion, query performance is d
Thank you Anup,
Yup, the upgradesstables is a step I generally take before (to make sure
I'm on the latest version) and after to make sure I'm updating to the
latest sstable version supported by the version. I know it's redundant and
not necessary but I read it does not hurt.
I am looking into th
