Thanks Jordan, Sent using Zoho Mail On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 21:28:54 +0430
Jordan West wrote
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13289 is a new feature, not yet
available (its merged into trunk), that I believe will let you monitor what you
want. On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 4:03
you define the max size of your heap (-Xmx), but you do not define the max
size of your offheap (MaxMetaspaceSize for jdk 8, PermSize for jdk7), so
you could occupy all of the memory on the instance. your system killed the
process to preserve itself. you should also take into account that the
mem
On 19 July 2018 at 10:43, Léo FERLIN SUTTON wrote:
> Hello list !
>
> I have a question about cassandra memory usage.
>
> My cassandra nodes are slowly using up all my ram until they get OOM-Killed.
>
> When I check the memory usage with nodetool info the memory
> (off-heap+heap) doesn't match wha
Thanks Jonathan.
this is device addition use case where we can't assign same value to more than
one device, so we need isolation property. With regular UUID, we may end up
assigning same value to two devices. I will talk to dev team and see if this
can be changed and handled at application leve
You don’t get this guarantee with counters. Do not use them for unique
values. Use a UUID instead.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 9:11 AM learner dba
wrote:
> James,
>
> Yes, counter is implemented due to valid reasons. We need this value
> column to have unique values being used at the time of regis
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13289 is a new feature, not
yet available (its merged into trunk), that I believe will let you monitor
what you want.
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 4:03 AM, onmstester onmstester
wrote:
> I'm using RF=2 and Write consistency = ONE, is there a counter in
James,
Yes, counter is implemented due to valid reasons. We need this value column to
have unique values being used at the time of registering new devices.On
Monday, July 23, 2018, 10:07:54 AM CDT, James Shaw wrote:
does your application really need counter ? just an option.
Thanks,
does your application really need counter ? just an option.
Thanks,
James
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:57 AM, learner dba wrote:
> Thanks a lot Ben. This makes sense but feel bad that we don't have a
> solution yet. We can try consistency level one but that will be against
> general rule for ha
Thanks a lot Ben. This makes sense but feel bad that we don't have a solution
yet. We can try consistency level one but that will be against general rule for
having local_quorum for production. Also, consistency ONE will not guarantee 0
race condition.
Is there any better solution?
On Satur
Goutham,
How will it make any difference? Could you please elaborate?
On Saturday, July 21, 2018, 8:20:31 PM CDT, Goutham reddy
wrote:
Hi,As it is a single partition key, try to update the key with only partition
key instead of passing other columns. And try to set consistency level ON
10 matches
Mail list logo
