Re: Resetting a counter in CQL

2014-03-01 Thread Edward Capriolo
If you want super accurate "counters" a good option available is to to batching on the client side and then take advantage of CAS. For now counters for smaller windows of time (think minute not days) should help with some drift issues. On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Tupshin Harper wrote: > The

Re: Resetting a counter in CQL

2014-03-01 Thread Tupshin Harper
The complete rewrite of counters in 2.1(which should address the counter accuracy issues) will still have this limitation. Deleting and recreating counters is not supported and will continue to not be supported. -Tupshin On Mar 1, 2014 5:13 PM, "Manoj Khangaonkar" wrote: > The last time I check

Re: Resetting a counter in CQL

2014-03-01 Thread Manoj Khangaonkar
The last time I checked as in v 2.0.0 counters did not work. Over a period of time , the counters drift from the correct value. There were several open issues and proposal to rewrite the counter implementation Have you checked if all the issues with counters have been fixed ? regards On Fri, Fe

Re: Provisioning/Configuration Question

2014-03-01 Thread William Katsak
Hi Tim, On 03/01/2014 02:02 PM, Tim Wintle wrote: 137GB would fairly easily fit in core memory on a single node these days: so it seems a very low amount for a 27 node cluster.. Note that we only have 4 GB of RAM per node, so only 1 GB of Cassandra heap. Are you assuming large memory servers

Re: Provisioning/Configuration Question

2014-03-01 Thread Tim Wintle
137GB would fairly easily fit in core memory on a single node these days: so it seems a very low amount for a 27 node cluster.. Off the top of my head: would 99th percentile latency be improved by using replication factor 5, assuming you are doing quorum operations.. Sent from my phone On 1 Mar 2

Provisioning/Configuration Question

2014-03-01 Thread William Katsak
Hello, I am doing some academic work with Cassandra 1.1.6 (I am on an older version because of a bunch of implemented modifications that have been in the works for a while), and I am wondering if the list can help me resolve some questions I have. I am running a cluster of 27 nodes with the foll

Re: Why repair -pr doesn't work when RF=0 for 1 DC

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Armel Luce
Hi Fabrice and Yuri, Thanks for your questions and answers. >From my point of view, it is now a common architecture to have 1 or more DC for on line queries, and 1 DC for stats. It is also very common (and recommended ?) to specify -pr option for anti-entropy repair operations. In my case, I ha