Re: subant project dependency

2003-10-09 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 09 October 2003 15:43, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, John-Mason Shackelford > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Then computeBuildPath would operate as follows: > > > > As Domin

RE: subant project dependency

2003-10-09 Thread Dominique Devienne
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, John-Mason Shackelford > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Then computeBuildPath would operate as follows: > > As Dominique's version needs a separate file with extra information > as well, I'd s

Re: subant project dependency

2003-10-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, John-Mason Shackelford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then computeBuildPath would operate as follows: As Dominique's version needs a separate file with extra information as well, I'd say it is fine for the algorithm (I prefer to keep it pluggable) to pick up additional files. Y

subant project dependency

2003-10-09 Thread Shackelford, John-Mason
Brian, Tell me what you think of this idea--I don't know if I like it or not: Instead of having a separate component.xml we could have an ant task that we would place just under the element in each build file. Then in the build target we'd have: (which we'll need whether we are using this appr