RE: rsync wildcard

2005-04-06 Thread Euan Guttridge
Thanks Daniel - works a treat: - Daniel wrote : Looks like Ant doesn't do the expansion that the shell does. This is OK - I don't think it is supposed to. You can use the "apply" task and specify the *.gz files as a fileset: - Daniel Euan Guttridge wrote: >Hi > >Can

RE: rsync wildcard

2005-04-06 Thread Matt Benson
--- Christoph Bugel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IIRC you can also supply the args separately, > instead > of using line=. > s/can/should/ -Matt > > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://person

Re: rsync wildcard

2005-04-06 Thread frode
If you want shell expansion, you could probably exec "sh" and use On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 15:42:21 +0300, Daniel Blaukopf wrote: > Looks like Ant doesn't do the expansion that the shell does. This is OK > - I don't think it is supposed to. You can use the "apply" task and > specify the *.gz file

Re: rsync wildcard

2005-04-06 Thread Daniel Blaukopf
Looks like Ant doesn't do the expansion that the shell does. This is OK - I don't think it is supposed to. You can use the "apply" task and specify the *.gz files as a fileset: - Daniel Euan Guttridge wrote: Hi Can anyone advise why the following works on the command line, but

RE: rsync wildcard

2005-04-06 Thread Christoph Bugel
> Can anyone advise why the following works on the command line, but not > within an ant script. The error is 'file/directory does not exist', when > it clearly does. If I change the *.gz to a specific file it works fine. > > > > > When you replace "rsync" with "echo" you will see that the quo

rsync wildcard

2005-04-06 Thread Euan Guttridge
Hi Can anyone advise why the following works on the command line, but not within an ant script. The error is 'file/directory does not exist', when it clearly does. If I change the *.gz to a specific file it works fine. Thanks -