Re: published module storage

2008-02-12 Thread Stephen Nesbitt
On Monday 11 February 2008 09:49:29 pm Shawn Castrianni wrote: > We have a debate going on about where to store our published modules. Some > say it should be on a filesystem so that we can delete older builds to > reclaim disk space since we should always be able to repeat a build from > the past

Re: published module storage

2008-02-11 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:49:29PM -0600, Shawn Castrianni wrote: > We have a debate going on about where to store our published > modules. Some say it should be on a filesystem so that we can > delete older builds to reclaim disk space since we should always > be able to repeat a build from the p

published module storage

2008-02-11 Thread Shawn Castrianni
We have a debate going on about where to store our published modules. Some say it should be on a filesystem so that we can delete older builds to reclaim disk space since we should always be able to repeat a build from the past if needed. Some say they all should be checked into an SCM reposit