On 9/12/07, Prashant Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 14:37 +0100, Peter Reilly wrote:
> > > Shouldn't javadoc task pick this artifact (package-info.java) given
> > that
> > > this file is meant only for the javadoc tool ? Why should the user
> > have
> > > to explicitly i
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 14:37 +0100, Peter Reilly wrote:
> > Shouldn't javadoc task pick this artifact (package-info.java) given
> that
> > this file is meant only for the javadoc tool ? Why should the user
> have
> > to explicitly include it ?
> 1) the fileset is not only used in
I was thinking m
On 9/12/07, Prashant Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello ANT Users,
>
> I have a lot of files from which javadoc needs to be generated.
>
> Not all java files from a package need to be published in javadoc.
>
> To enable this i use a number of s that provide input to
> javadoc task.
>
> Someth
Hello ANT Users,
I have a lot of files from which javadoc needs to be generated.
Not all java files from a package need to be published in javadoc.
To enable this i use a number of s that provide input to
javadoc task.
Something like :
//More filesets
However to my su
