David Weintraub wrote:
>
> There are several things you can use:
> ...
>
Thanks for pointing out defmacro and antcall. Looks like they could help me
out with this problem.
ER
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/factoring-out-commonality-in-sequen
> What's the best way to factor out the commonality of these two targets?
>
> Note that , , etc. are going to be sequence of tasks and not
> just a single task element.
> (Is it possible to define a task which is a sequence of tasks?)
>
> Thanks,
> ER
>
>
>
pecified with
the following declarations:
...
...
...
...
but then how do I set up the depends for target-3?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/factoring-out-commonality-in-sequences-of-tasks-tp24155135p24157115.html
Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at
jscripter schrieb am 22.06.2009 um 14:16:24 (-0700):
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> > ...
> I need to preserve the execution order of the tasks, so I don't think
> that would work.
>From a recent post of David Weintraub:
| You say that B depends upon A, and C depends upon A and that A depends
unit placed in the dependency graph?
>
>
> ...
>
>
> ...
>
> Michael Ludwig
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-h.
jscripter schrieb am 22.06.2009 um 13:46:19 (-0700):
>
> Suppose I have an operation which deploys files and I have the option
> of deploying the files by copying them and deploying using symlinks:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> What's the best way to fact
ce of tasks and not
just a single task element.
(Is it possible to define a task which is a sequence of tasks?)
Thanks,
ER
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/factoring-out-commonality-in-sequences-of-tasks-tp24155135p24155135.html
Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archi
