On 2009-01-12, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Le lundi 12 janvier 2009, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>> On 2009-01-12, Francis Galiegue wrote:
>>> The more it goes, the more I'm skeptical about this "different development
>>> model" schism between ant and ant-contrib.
>> Ant == community driven ASF pro
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> On 2009-01-12, Francis Galiegue wrote:
>
> > The more it goes, the more I'm skeptical about this "different development
> > model" schism between ant and ant-contrib.
>
> Ant == community driven ASF project
> ant-contrib == "benevolent dictato
On 2009-01-12, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> The more it goes, the more I'm skeptical about this "different development
> model" schism between ant and ant-contrib.
Ant == community driven ASF project
ant-contrib == "benevolent dictator" style project with external
contributions
> Or
Le lundi 12 janvier 2009, patrick wyss a écrit :
[...]
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> >
> > Yes, the Ant way is to write a custom task, or more generally the Ant
> > way is to move the iteration into a task rather than have it external.
> >
> this is probably the way to go...
> and on a second thought
...
i'll be back if i run in problems doing this ;-)
thanks
patrick
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ant-for-and-foreach-tasks-use-them-or-not-tp21353056p21412108.html
Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
On 2009-01-08, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Your specific problem is extraordinarily commons, though. A companion
>> task to that provides what is to has been asked
>> for many times before,
>> it just seems as if nobofy has found th
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Your specific problem is extraordinarily commons, though. A companion
> task to that provides what is to has been asked
> for many times before, I'm pretty certain there is a bugzilla issue
> for it[1]
I've used to fork java.exe in the
On 2009-01-08, patrick wyss wrote:
> so now i found for and foreach from the ant-contrib
> *but*
[disclaimer, I've contributed to ant-contrib and I am an Ant
committer, don't expect an unbiased response]
> 2) some of the other tasks seem rather obscure to me (AntCallBack,
> RunTarget, Throw) so
Le jeudi 08 janvier 2009, patrick wyss a écrit :
>
> hi there,
>
> i have the reqirement to do a java call for each file in a filelist.
>
> first i tought i'd use the "Apply" task, but then again i do not realy want
> to start a new process and load a new JVM etc. for each file i handle.
>
> so
concerned this is the ant-y
way to go.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Rémon
-Original Message-
From: patrick wyss [mailto:pw...@ergonomics.ch]
Sent: donderdag 8 januari 2009 15:43
To: user@ant.apache.org
Subject: ant for and foreach tasks use them or not
hi there,
i have the
f doing what they do?
(appart from writing my own ant task...)
any help appreciated
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ant-for-and-foreach-tasks-use-them-or-not-tp21353056p21353056.html
Sent from the Ant - Users mailing list a
11 matches
Mail list logo