Re: about BOMs

2009-06-19 Thread Michael Ludwig
Peter Reilly schrieb am 19.06.2009 um 08:05:50 (+0100): > Please be aware that this is a long standing problem. > Sun does not allow the BOM and it's UTF-8 reader > converts it into a ?. Thanks for bringing this Sun Java bug to my attention. I wasn't aware of this handicap. > This is what the an

Re: about BOMs

2009-06-19 Thread Peter Reilly
Please be aware that this is a long standing problem. Byte ordering is needed for utf-16 and 32, and there is a byteordering code for that at the start of the file. For utf-8 byte ordering is not required, however the utf-8 standard is a little vague as to whether it is not allowed. this means

Re: about BOMs

2009-06-18 Thread Michael Ludwig
China Creatxr schrieb am 16.06.2009 um 14:27:37 (+): > Does anyone find the way to run the utf-8 formated SQL scripts which > with BOMs by Ant now? Thanks. The task has an @encoding attribute. Set sql/@encoding = 'UTF-8' and see if that helps, which it should do. Michael Ludwig ---

Re: about BOMs

2009-06-16 Thread bryan rasmussen
I can't really answer this one, but what exactly causes you to assume that it is due to the presence of a BOM in the SQL? Have you tested by removing and running it? If not then you should probably send the actual SQL that is generated because it seems to me that it would be more likely to be the

about BOMs

2009-06-16 Thread China Creatxr
hi, Does anyone find the way to run the utf-8 formated SQL scripts which with BOMs by Ant now? Thanks. [sql] Failed to execute: ??CREATE TABLE