RE: Unresolved dependency error message makes no sense.

2009-02-10 Thread Buck, Robert
etween the current and two versions back. -Original Message- From: Maarten Coene [mailto:maarten_co...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 4:36 PM To: ivy-u...@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: Unresolved dependency error message makes no sense. It seems you still don't hav

Re: Unresolved dependency error message makes no sense.

2009-02-10 Thread Maarten Coene
ert" To: ivy-u...@ant.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 9:05:05 PM Subject: Unresolved dependency error message makes no sense. Is this what is desired? The error message here is not a proper sentence and makes no sense; it does not help me diagnose the issue. Could someone update the

Re: Unresolved dependency error message makes no sense.

2009-02-10 Thread Garima Bathla
It does makes sense >From the error : configurations={core=core, stax=stax, xpp3=xpp3, woodstox=woodstox} You only have above configurations available but somewhere in some dependency you are referring to default conf which does not exist. On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Buck, Robert wrote:

Unresolved dependency error message makes no sense.

2009-02-10 Thread Buck, Robert
Is this what is desired? The error message here is not a proper sentence and makes no sense; it does not help me diagnose the issue. Could someone update the resource bundle text so that it has a proper english sentence? >>> "'default' doesn't exist in module module" <<< Thanks [ivy:resolve]