Re: Suggestiosn for ANT-Java programming book

2004-03-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Kenneth Litwak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does 1.6.1 change the rules or only offer extensions? It offers so many and valuable extensions that it changes the "best practices" for Ant usage - at least for big projects. Everything in Erik's and Steve's book should work wit

RE: Suggestiosn for ANT-Java programming book

2004-03-24 Thread Matt Benson
D] > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 6:04 PM > To: Ant Users List > Subject: Re: Suggestiosn for ANT-Java programming > book > > Ken, > > We have a chapter (12) titled "Developing for the > web" in JDwA. > > I agree with the other comments on this thre

RE: Suggestiosn for ANT-Java programming book

2004-03-24 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Kenneth Litwak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I ordered your book yesterday, and now I have a question. I > downloaded Ant 1.6.1. Does your comment mean that I won't be able to > use the example sin the book to use 1.6.1? Does 1.6.1 change the rules > or only offer extensions? Thanks. T

RE: Suggestiosn for ANT-Java programming book

2004-03-24 Thread Kenneth Litwak
Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 6:04 PM To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: Suggestiosn for ANT-Java programming book Ken, We have a chapter (12) titled "Developing for the web" in JDwA. I agree with the other comments on this thread - there is no book t

RE: Suggestiosn for ANT-Java programming book

2004-03-24 Thread Kenneth Litwak
u remember if that's in there? > Thanks. > > Ken > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:32 AM > To: Ant Users List > Cc: Ant Users List > Subject: Re: Suggestiosn for ANT-Java programming