Re: Installing Ant is non-standard and stupid

2007-08-08 Thread Scot P. Floess
Building Ant isn't too tough... Try building Firefox or any of the JDKs...that's a pain Anderson, Rob (Global Trade) wrote: -Original Message- From: evilfred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:56 PM To: user@ant.apache.org Subject: Installing Ant is non-stand

RE: Installing Ant is non-standard and stupid

2007-08-08 Thread Anderson, Rob (Global Trade)
> -Original Message- > From: evilfred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 1:56 PM > To: user@ant.apache.org > Subject: Installing Ant is non-standard and stupid > > This is a rant. > > Why does Ant (at least the source distro) not install like > *every other sane

Re: Installing Ant is non-standard and stupid

2007-07-25 Thread Steve Loughran
evilfred wrote: This is a rant. Why does Ant (at least the source distro) not install like *every other sane source distro on earth*, with "configure / make / make install". This is what users expect and enter by default. I'd rather not mess around having to read proprietary installation inf

Re: Installing Ant is non-standard and stupid

2007-07-24 Thread Matt Benson
--- evilfred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a rant. > I thought rant was a Ruby tool... but seriously: > Why does Ant (at least the source distro) not > install like *every other sane > source distro on earth*, with "configure / make / > make install". This is > what users expect and ent