Success!
David Weintraub wrote:
>
> Would using the task help? Before unzipping, you can "touch"
> all the properties files that you don't want to overwrite, giving them
> a newer timestamp than the files inside the zipfile.
>
> Of course, you'll destroy the previous dates, but it will help p
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:22 PM, rdblaha1 wrote:
>
> Thank you David for pointing out the OLDER vs. NEWER timestamp. The
> timestamp of the existing files is always OLDER in my testing.
Would using the task help? Before unzipping, you can "touch"
all the properties files that you don't want to ov
Thank you David for pointing out the OLDER vs. NEWER timestamp. The
timestamp of the existing files is always OLDER in my testing.
My problem isn't solved with the patternset as I previously thought. If my
config properties files don't exist in the dest directory in the first place
I DO want th
Quick question: What is the timestamp on these files?
If you set the overwrite parameter to false, it may be overwriting
files that have an OLDER timestamp than the file that's replacing it.
The description of this parameter is:
Overwrite files, even if they are newer than the corresponding
Initial problem solved, but leaves questions from this newbie.
I modified the code by adding the patternset:
This cleared up my problem, but leaves the questio
Disregard this post. Turns out in the Ant target called by *antcall*, I was
using refid below, not torefid:
In other words, my mistake. And that warning was what was catching it. This
is one case where I'm happy to be embarrassed.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Mitch Gitman wr
2008/9/30 Marijan (Mario) Madunic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm trying to run various XSLT tasks that either rely on Xalan or Saxon and
> am having a hard time with ANT recognizing Xalan when Saxon is in the
> Ant/lib. The reason I am running both is that Xalan has a better extension
> for SQL than Sa
On 11/9/07, Francis ANDRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Ant documentation specifies for the task:
>
> dir: the directory to use as a basedir for the new Ant project. Defaults to
> the
> current project's basedir, unless inheritall has been set to false, in which
> case it doesn't have a defaul
The Ant documentation specifies for the task:
dir: the directory to use as a basedir for the new Ant project. Defaults to the
current project's basedir, unless inheritall has been set to false, in which
case it doesn't have a default value. This will override the basedir setting of
the called
On 11/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the following code:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
You're problem is likely that you don't use file names which are unambiguous.
needs to compute the relative path between the
jarfile, and the jars or directories listed in t
Hi Listeners
With the following code:
=09
=09=09
=09
=09=09
=09=09
=09=09
=09=09
=09=09
=09=09
=09=09
=09=09
=09=09
=09
=09
I got 2 different lists if the build.xml is called locally from the =20
command prompt or from a super build.xml via
Locally, the echo is
On 11/8/07, Francis ANDRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can somebody explain me how the ManifestClassPath is working?? I am trying to
> use it for building multiple jars dependencies within an ear but I never get
> the
> "rigth" Class-Path in the manifest.mf.
Sharing your current Ant code and show
James Mao wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded from ant 1.6 to ant 1.7, and now i also upgraded to junit 4
But i can not see the *ignored tests* in the brief formatter mode.
Is it a known issue?
Not so much an "issue" as a feature that could only be implemented if
went to junit4 only, which it canno
> It would be great to have an example build.xml that
> shows the problem.
bug 42219
--
[ I love pre-moistened towelettes ] Mike McNally -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e
> It would be great to have an example build.xml that
> shows the problem.
I'm going to work on that today. The problem is a very simple one
however: using a large ArrayList as if it were a Set simply does not
perform well :)
> A number of performance problems were fixed in ant 1.7.0, so
> it wou
e some performance tests with your project in our next 1.7.1
release phase ;-)
Jan
>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>Von: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. April 2007 00:45
>An: Ant Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Betreff: Re: Ant 1.7 build, high CPU u
--- Mike McNally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using Ant to build a fairly large web
> application (about
> twelve thousand .class files and various other
> things in a multi-phase
> build) for several years. We've generally been
> pretty happy with Ant
> performance. Recently, however
Ouch. Looks like several tasks are marked this way; a
stylesheet did not have "BETA" removed as it should
have. :( Rest assured that this is a mistake, and
that macrodef, nor apply, etc. are considered "beta"
tasks.
-Matt
--- Michael Giroux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The MacroDef documentat
On 2/8/07, THARP, JOSHUA L, TCORP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know if the same methods for adding junit.jar to the
classpath are true for JDepend using ANT 1.7?
No, it is not yet implemented.
Peter
I've tried adding a
jdepend-2.9.jar classpath entry to invocation of the jdepend tas
Great, thank you for the explanation and your help.
Original Message Follows
From: "Antoine Levy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Ant Users List"
To: "Ant Users List"
Subject: Re: ant 1.7
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:27:00 +0100
Hello,
the pom
Hello,
the pom files are descriptors of the jars in the maven environment. They give a
hint that ant jars will be in the future - not right now but hopefully in a few
days - be available for Ant API developers. For instance if you develop ant
custom tasks, or maybe a server application which is
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 August 2006 19:51
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: Ant 1.7!
Is there a summary of what's new in 1.7 available on the web somewhere?
I didn't find anything like that in my brief look at
http://ant.apache.org/ just now. Maybe I just wasn't look
On Wed, 02 Aug 2006, Richard Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a summary of what's new in 1.7 available on the web
> somewhere?
It won't provide a big-bang like 1.6 did, mostly bug fixes, the
concept of ResourceCollections (unification of fileset and path among
others) and some enhance
Is there a summary of what's new in 1.7 available on the web somewhere?
I didn't find anything like that in my brief look at
http://ant.apache.org/ just now. Maybe I just wasn't looking hard
enough...
Thanks,
Rich Wagner
SavaJe Technologies, Inc.
David Corley (AT/LMI) wrote:
Just wondering when we should expect to see Ant 1.7 roughly? I know
Steve Loughran gave a presentation at HP that's available on the web
last year some time, and the nightly builds are ongoing, but it would be
useful to have a rough dateeven if someone could say 3
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006, Patrick Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for this super-fast answer.
> So still has its importance.
Even if it didn't, we'd still keep it around for backwards
compatibility and may still be
easier to read and more convenient to write than
I'd stick with u
--- Patrick Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for this super-fast answer.
> So still has its importance.
>
> Concerning the encoding, I see that can
> set it. So it
> does not seem an issue here.
Maybe not... I was just guessing. ;)
>
> I am just being curious here... would it b
Thank you for this super-fast answer.
So still has its importance.
Concerning the encoding, I see that can set it. So it
does not seem an issue here.
I am just being curious here... would it be hard to allow all file
based resource collection in (several resources)? I
always thought that limit
--- Patrick Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having a look at the new resource feature in
> ant 1.7. This looks
> extremly promising! Congratulations!
>
> I have a question regarding and : do
> we still need
> in 1.7? Can't we do everyting can do
> with now?
Hmm... I hadn
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, David M. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, David M. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Anyone have any idea when Ant 1.7 will become official?
>>
>> I wouldn't hold my breath. We haven't added too many
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, David M. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyone have any idea when Ant 1.7 will become official?
>
> I wouldn't hold my breath. We haven't added too many really big
> changes, but one of them (ResourceCollections) is onl
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, David M. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have any idea when Ant 1.7 will become official?
I wouldn't hold my breath. We haven't added too many really big
changes, but one of them (ResourceCollections) is only slowly getting
picked up by existing tasks - and it only
Why cannot you do it now? I do use ANT 1.7 (even worse - locally
patched) in my build scripts.
- Alexey.
David M. Lee wrote:
Anyone have any idea when Ant 1.7 will become official? I'd really love
to start using signjar's TSA option to timestamp my .jar file
signatures.
dave
<><
CONFIDENTIA
33 matches
Mail list logo
