>Betreff: Re: More on antcall versus macrodef
>
>On 8/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just a note: I like the idea of using property-files SNIP
>
>Just realised I forgot to thank you for this advice. I
>modified the approach a little but this
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 9:56 AM
To: user@ant.apache.org
Subject: RE: More on antcall versus macrodef
yes indeed.
I was going to provide the same advice, as i am using prefixed properties files
to get rid of the if-then-else idiom.
Hind Lwahhabi.
Accenture
5 44
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 8/4/2005 2:52 PM
To: user@ant.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: More on antcall versus macrodef
Just a note: I like the idea of using property-files
life.proper
6 75 44
E-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Richard Gaywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 8/4/2005 2:31 PM
To: user@ant.apache.org
Subject: More on antcall versus macrodef
Hi all. Short time lurker, first time poster but I did search the
archives! I'm pretty s
erstag, 4. August 2005 14:31
>An: user@ant.apache.org
>Betreff: More on antcall versus macrodef
>
>Hi all. Short time lurker, first time poster but I did search
>the archives! I'm pretty sure I can hear list regulars
>groaning at my subject line but here goes.
>
>I&#x
Hi all. Short time lurker, first time poster but I did search the
archives! I'm pretty sure I can hear list regulars groaning at my
subject line but here goes.
I'm build manager for a fairly chunky Java webapp with an overly
complex Ant 1.5 build script that I am refining using the new features
in
