Message-
From: Bill Chmura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:45 AM
To: 'Ant Users List'
Subject: RE: Major frustration.
On a non-technical note: Have you tried walking away from it for a
little bit? Seriously I cannot count the number of times a solution
came t
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 2:38 PM
To: Ant Users List
Subject: Re: Major frustration.
Thanks for the response. . .no joy, no change.
Changes I made. . .
So now the ejbdoclet uses the classpathref also. (the webdoclettask had
originally used the old way as well, the classpathref was
Thanks for the response. . .no joy, no change.
Changes I made. . .
So now the ejbdoclet uses the classpathref also. (the webdoclettask had
originally used the old way as well, the classpathref was an attempted
solution).
Also, just out of desperation tried switching to Sun's J2SE 1.4.1_02. .
Perhaps a nuance between the ejbDocklet
subelement and the webdoclet
classpathref="xdoclet.path" attribute?
Ant docs show that you do have it correctly, but it may be worth playing
with to see if you get a variation in the errors (or it working.)
You may look at line 270 of your build.xml file f
; part. I'm just guessing...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gerald D. Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Major frustration.
Hey all,
Thanks for reading, I'm about to the point of homicide/suicide with
this thin
