Ah... I did read this issue wrongly. Yes, DD's
suggestion would be the only way to do this as
builds up a map (whose order is not guaranteed) to do
the copies. Using a separate copy operation for each
fileset would work. In Ant 1.7, you might add each
fileset to a and use that for your copy so
On Feb 11, 2008 11:34 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about 3 copies instead? Guaranteed ordering ;-) --DD
> I don't think that there is a guarantee of the order ...
The way I read the problem, order within any given fileset was
irrelevant, and each set should simply be copied in some orde
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In Machine1 fileset 1,2,3 copied in order, But In machine2 it is
> > copied in the reverse order i.e., 3,2,1.
> >
> > Since some of my filesets has the different version of the
> same file i
> > am facing some issues.
> >
> > Please anyone let me know is there some
On Feb 11, 2008 4:14 AM, ms harsha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 2 machines and both has same ant and java versions.
>
> When i compile a code in both the machine,
>
> Machine 1 acts correctly. But in Machine2 the filesets are copied in
> the reverse order. i.e.,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In Machi
Hi,
I have 2 machines and both has same ant and java versions.
When i compile a code in both the machine,
Machine 1 acts correctly. But in Machine2 the filesets are copied in
the reverse order. i.e.,
In Machine1 fileset 1,2,3 copied in order, But In machine2 it is
copied in the reverse or
