Re: FW: Spamarrest

2003-02-11 Thread Conor MacNeill
Keith Hatton wrote: I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like spam to me. If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam. Can the list owners please deal with this guy. Thanks I requested the user to be unsubscribed about 7 hours ago. I wa

Re: FW: Spamarrest

2003-02-11 Thread Tony Obermeit
Is it possible this is just because the ant list was recently changed to a different address? At 09:41 AM 11/02/2003 +, you wrote: I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like spam to me. If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam. Can

Re: FW: Spamarrest

2003-02-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Keith Hatton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with > spam. You are certainly correct. At least not for people subscribing to mailing lists. > Can the list owners please deal with this guy. They've been asked to already

FW: Spamarrest

2003-02-11 Thread Keith Hatton
I don't know whether this is genuine but as I'm paranoid :) it looks like spam to me. If it is genuine I don't think it is the right way to deal with spam. Can the list owners please deal with this guy. Thanks -Original Message- From: konrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 Februar