Re: Extending org.apache.tools.ant.types.Path in Ant 1.7

2007-07-24 Thread Paul J. Morris
o that >> > isn't possible. >> > >> > >> > Or is there something I'm missing? >> > >> >> No--I'd call this a regression (introduced by yours >> truly). If possible, could you open a bugzilla >> report >

Re: Extending org.apache.tools.ant.types.Path in Ant 1.7

2007-07-24 Thread Matt Benson
) ) , so that > > isn't possible. > > > > > > Or is there something I'm missing? > > > > No--I'd call this a regression (introduced by yours > truly). If possible, could you open a bugzilla > report > for this, and maybe we can get it

Re: Extending org.apache.tools.ant.types.Path in Ant 1.7

2007-07-23 Thread Matt Benson
I'd call this a regression (introduced by yours truly). If possible, could you open a bugzilla report for this, and maybe we can get it fixed in time for Ant 1.7.1 . -Matt > > thanks > Paul > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Extendin

Extending org.apache.tools.ant.types.Path in Ant 1.7

2007-07-23 Thread Paul J. Morris
marked as final (public final synchronized Iterator iterator() ) , so that isn't possible. Or is there something I'm missing? thanks Paul -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Extending-org.apache.tools.ant.types.Path-in-Ant-1.7-tf4133831.html#a11756872 Sent from the